Benedict
Cumberbatch must be getting sick of playing idiosyncratic geniuses. Fresh from
turns as Sherlock, Assange, Hawking, and van Gogh, the increasingly typecast
actor has had a go at one of this country’s most perplexing figures: Alan
Turing.
The Imitation Game tells one of the
twentieth century’s most important stories: Turing’s ingenious cracking of
Germany’s wartime messaging code. Turing was a troubled figure: bullied at
school, impossibly bright, insular and socially incompetent. Throughout the
film he is portrayed as a frazzled prodigy pushing his way up the autistic
spectrum.
Enigma
was a seemingly unbreakable code that even the master mathematician and
cryptographist Turing failed to understand. His travails at Bletchley Park form
the basis of a film that eschews some of the more controversial aspects of
Turing’s life.
As endless characters remind us throughout
the film, Turing was a more engaging enigma than the machine they were trying
to crack. Much of this is lost in Norwegian director Morten Tyldum’s film. Turing’s troubled childhood,
homosexuality, and conviction for indecency are touched upon but rarely
developed. Likewise, tenuous links are drawn between the various strands of
Turing’s life and his attempt to crack enigma. It is difficult to know the
veracity of these strands and they arguably simplify his life into a
blockbuster-sized chunk that is easily digestible with popcorn and fizzy
drinks.
Cumberbatch is predictably
brilliant as Turing and the years of practice as Holmes have clearly paid off.
Throughout the film’s 115 minutes Turing is presented as a slightly more
angst-ridden and significantly less charming version of Sherlock’s blueprint. Cumberbatch
is undoubtedly forging a name for himself as one of his generations’ most
talented actors but it would be refreshing to see him in a role that didn’t
confine him to his comfort zone.
Turing’s
life and his work on enigma at Bletchley Park are fascinating. Unfortunately,
this film doesn’t do justice to the complexity of his story. It falls at the
same hurdles that seem to afflict all British biopics: taking an intimate and
peculiar story and trying to morph it into a swashbuckling blockbuster. The
film would have been more successful if it had given the time and space to
Turing’s more troubled and ambiguous story.
Biopics are
fraught with difficulty. Any attempt to accurately or inaccurately represent a
subject’s life will be met with condescension from one side of the argument. It
is impossible to please all parties. The central problem with The Imitation Game is that it doesn’t
even try. By morphing Turing’s story into a Hollywood fable we lose the colour
and intrigue that made Turing such a fascinating character. His work, and his
life, deserved better.
No comments:
Post a Comment